|
5
Challenges of the new Europe
Opinion polls repeatedly demonstrate that the Finnish
public are quite unanimous on one issue: the welfare state must be safeguarded. Political
parties across the board assure us that they agree with the voters on this point. Just as
the concept of the welfare state is interpreted in various ways, so is also the scope and
structure of the services needed to maintain it. Two Finnish language studies published in
2002 (Anu Kantola, Mikko Kautto: Hyvinvoinnin valinnat [the choices of welfare] and Jaakko
Kiander, Henrik Lönnqvist: Hyvinvointivaltio ja talouskasvu [welfare and economic
growth]) offer a solid basis for a debate in which the trade union movement must also
participate actively.
These studies indicate that three matters in particular threaten the welfare state. The
ageing of the population and the retirement of the baby boom generation generate
considerable pressure to increase health care and pension expenditure. According to
Kiander and Lönnqvist, safeguarding welfare state financing will mean increasing the
employment rate, reducing unemployment and restricting the growth of other expenses.
Even though manufacturing no longer provides employment as it once did, industry remains
the engine of the national economy. Enterprise globalisation has, however, changed the
relationship between those enterprises and Finland. Management - at least if it wants to
retain its position - feels a responsibility towards shareholders a clear majority of
whom, in the case of large enterprises, are not Finns. Products are manufactured where it
is most profitable to do so in respect of costs, markets and other factors. Finland is in
a faraway North-Eastern corner of Europe, and this fact is not expected to change. The
patriotism of Finnish business managers is increasingly tested.
The third threat to the welfare state, as viewed by the researchers, is Europe's
continuous tax competition, upon which EU authorities can secure no grip because of the
opposition of the countries that benefit from this tax competition. The Netherlands,
Belgium, Ireland and others encourage enterprises to establish and invest by offering
multi-year tax concessions and lower tax bases. The researchers think that over the longer
term the countries with higher taxation will have to concede and lower their corporation
taxes, and probably also personal taxation, especially in the high-income bracket.
At the same time the European Union is on the threshold of enlargement and deeper
integration. On 1 May 2004 ten new Member States join the EU family, including Estonia,
Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. In all of these countries the pay level is one-fifth or
one-sixth of the pay level in Finland, the organising rate is about 15 to 20 per cent and
corporate taxation is light. Labour intensive production is increasingly relocating to
these countries. On the other hand, some degree of migration from the new Member States to
the old ones is expected, driven by the prospect of higher living standards.
Discussion of the EU's future is approaching a stage at which the Convention, gathered
from various circles, is returning the ball to the governments of the Member States. There
are three main lines of evolution. Should the Union evolve towards a federal state with an
increase in the powers of its Parliament? Or should it compromise by reinforcing community
features, meaning co-operation between the Commission and the Council of Ministers? Or
should it return to inter-governmentalism, so that each nation's point of view becomes
more visible? New bodies, such as the President and the Congress of Nations have been
proposed for the negotiators.
The governments of the EU Member State are seeking a settlement in 2004 that may take the
form of a European Union Constitution. Besides institutional matters, the core questions
concern what the Union must do: which matters will be subject to its authority and which
will remain with the Member States. The last night of the inter-governmental conference is
expected to be one of drama and unpredictable horse-trading.
Globalisation of business life creates major news headlines almost every week. Mergers and
changes in enterprise ownership occur ceaselessly, factories are closed and production is
centralised. The September 11 terrorist attack, the war in Iraq and the SARS epidemic
cause important changes.
In the midst of this turmoil the trade union movement seeks to continue its basic
functions: organising employees, negotiating proper collective agreements and resolving
conflicts. Globalisation places the unions in a new setting, working across national
borders and seeking new structures and ways to safeguard jobs and the livelihoods of their
rank and file members.
Major changes are also expected in Finland due to national, European and global factors.
Challenges and opportunities of
economic and structural changes from the trade union movement point of view
| Challenges |
Opportunities |
- ageing of the population and retirement of the baby boom generation
- continued high unemployment, increased poverty
- simultaneous labour shortage and unemployment
- welfare state choices: where to direct resources, where to save them
- Finland is only one country among many where industry may operate
- ownership changes and mergers displace policymaking power outside of Finland
- economic problems associated with global policy
- the impact of problems in the USA and Germany
- regression of the telecommunication and IT industries
- EU enlargement, relocation of production, movement of labour force
- international tax competition
- disintegration of enterprise structures, outsourcing, subcontractor chains
- increase in temporary and casual employment
- generation shifts in the workforce and union activists
- industry no longer attracts the interest of young people
- threat of reduced organising rates due to many factors
|
- currently healthy financial condition of the State
- high education rate, equality in the educational system
- good infrastructure
- welfare services at reasonable level
- popular support for the welfare state and its financing
- rather high standard of living, clean environment and security
- rather high investment rate in research and development, public support
- paper and chemical industry among the few industries that interest young people
- retained high organising rate
- the stable situation and status of the trade unions
- retained consensus society despite pressure for change
|
Source: Jyrki Raina, based on work published in the
Finnish national newspaper Helsingin Sanomat on 28 July 2002 by Anna Karismo and Ritva
Remes
5.1 Tumultuous change imminent
in labour force and elected officials
In this decade a dramatic change will occur
both in the labour force and in the trade union movement.
By 2010 half of the over one million rank
and file members covered by the Confederation of Finnish Trade Unions SAK will
leave working life. The corresponding whol population figure is 700,000.
By 2009 half of the trade union
movement's present elected officials will leave working life. Presently there are 100,000
of them.
By 2008 more than half of all trade union
officials will retire.
In 2001 seven committees of
the Confederation of Finnish Trade Unions SAK provided a versatile analysis of the
future in a seminar. Researchers gave evidence indicating that public activity is eroding
in many ways. This is a universal phenomenon. The only possible exceptions may be
religious and "self-help" groups, and Internet-based activist groups. Political
activity lacks popular appeal, and young people in particular are not interested in it.
Yet, considering the situation, the atmosphere at the seminar was rather unperturbed.
Studies show that the trade union movement's public esteem in Finland remains permanently
high, and the basic attitude of young people towards the unions is not only interested but
positive. However, young people represent a blank slate, one researcher warned. It is very
important what kind of first contact they make with the trade union movement. This raises
the question how they are received at workplaces.
The results of a youth survey published by SAK in summer 2002 are encouraging. 42 per cent
of the 17-29 year old interviewees claimed to be union members and 34 per cent were
expecting to join when their working career began. Only 11 per cent regarded mere
membership of an unemployment benefit fund as sufficient.
The overwhelmingly most important reason for organising was the defence of interests. 71
per cent of young people explained their union membership by reference to union defence of
employee rights in working life. The next most important reason cited (60 per cent) was
earnings-related unemployment benefit, followed (56 per cent) by union information on
one's own rights. Fewer than 8 per cent claimed to have joined the union because of the
force of habit and only 3 per cent out of a sense of duty.
The next challenge is to activate young people to participate in trade union activities
and to take responsibility by serving as shop stewards and in other functions. In the past
the political struggle was so hot that it was often difficult for young people to secure
responsible positions as older unionists defended their positions and mandates. Lately
political competition has become marginalised, making it easier for young people to become
activists. However, one critical issue is the attractiveness of trade union activity among
so many rival hobbies and interests.
In summer 2002 Tuomo Lilja, the editor of the Chemical Workers' Union magazine, assessed
the situation in his own union as easier than on average. According to the union's
studies, its rank and file members and shop stewards are younger than the SAK average.
While there are none too many elected officials, many young members seem to be willing to
take part in union training. Of the 3,000 participants at the union's summer congress,
more than one-third were below 30 years of age.
As Lilja states, despite these good signs we must seriously consider the approaching
upheaval and prepare for it by training, communication and organisation work. We must also
remember that the image of the union and its attractiveness ultimately depends on deeds,
and above all on the defence of interests.
5.2 Threats of unemployment and manpower shortage
Enterprises are hardly likely to stand by passively waiting for
the retirement of 700,000 employees and the rapidly advancing risk of a labour shortage.
So, what are they doing?
Unemployment in Finland seems to have stuck at a level of 9 to10 per cent and there are
about 300,000 registered jobseekers, although some EU statistics show figures that have
been cosmetically adjusted downwards. On 30 June 2002 there were 78,300 persons who had
been continuously unemployed for more than a year. That was 6 per cent less than 12 months
earlier. Of these, 36,600 had been unemployed over two years. This figure was also
slightly down from the previous year. The number of people employed by various labour
market subsidies was over 115,000.
When the baby boom generation retires Finland may simultaneously be threatened by both
unemployment and a labour shortage, warns the Labour force 2020 -report published by the
Ministry of Labour. This will occur if the labour supply fails, quantitatively or
qualitatively, to match the demand in various regions. The training, trade structure and
deployment of the labour force are of major significance. The report seeks to forecast
changes in training needs by estimating the future trade structure, having regard to
continuing technological progress.
As the report notes, it is difficult to estimate how large a proportion of the jobs
current held by those soon to retire could be taken over by those who are presently
unemployed. According to the Ministry of Labour, the number of long-term unemployed has
recently fallen slightly, whereas the number of persons who are successively out of work
for short periods has grown. In general it seems that the higher the educational and
skills demands are, the more difficult it is to find replacement labour among the
registered unemployed. Employees in the chemical, paper and energy industries have rather
specialised vocational training.
Another aspect is psychological. Registered unemployed jobseekers are easily stigmatised,
encouraging employers to seek other solutions. A study by the University of Tampere and
the International Labour Organisation ILO concluded that the difficulty of the
long-time unemployed in securing employment is not caused by their unwillingness to work.
It is largely due to employer attitudes, whereby even a couple of months' unemployment and
ageing may make a person unfit for work. The status of the long-time unemployed has also
been influenced by competition for the same jobs from many other groups, such as people
changing vocation, students, the under-employed, and persons returning from family leave.
All of these are already in a better position in the labour market than the long-term
unemployed. A good education provides the ability to change and be flexible.
The basic prognosis is that the maximum size of labour force and employment will be
reached in 2005. A fall will then begin, and the size of both the labour force and the
employed will decrease by about 10,000 people per annum until the end of the projected
period. It is estimated that when the baby boom generation begins to retire 20,000 jobs
will be left vacant every year, a large proportion of these in the technical trades.
Despite the insecure economic outlook, a study by the Confederation of Finnish Industry
and Employers (TT) in February-March 2002 suggested that 600 enterprises believed they
would hire a total of 70,000 new employees within a year. They believed that they would
maintain the same level for at least next couple of years. This would mean 60 per cent
growth compared with 2001. The need for skilled labour has fallen, but the enterprises
plan to hire more school leavers and trainees. There were 32,000 jobs available for people
straight out of school, which was 10 per cent less than a year before. Most new jobs were
to be offered in engineering and in the pulp and paper industries. Often new employees are
hired to replace retirees or persons changing job. Business expansion also creates a
demand for new employees. In particular, there is demand for skilled employees in the
technical trades. Enterprises have voiced their fears of a shortage of skilled workers in
shopfloor jobs, as vocational training is failing to attract enough recruits.
In March 2002 the confederation of Finnish Industry and Employers (TT) called on
politicians to initiate an active immigration policy. According to the TT, there is a need
for 70,000 new employees per annum but only 50,000 are arriving.
It is possible that over the next ten years tens of thousands of skilled and unskilled
workers will come to Finland from abroad, and that enterprises will actively recruit
foreign labour. Even this may not be enough, however, and the threat of labour shortage
remains. Managers may have to consider relocating production away from Finland to regions
where labour is available.
Against this background the publication "Sensitivities in the future of work",
published in 2000 by the Finnish government's economic research institute (VATT), is
surprising. While the study presents an interesting outlook, it nevertheless reaches the
following conclusion. "Although restructuring due to technological development and
changes in the international division of labour will continue, there are reasons to
believe that the character of work and the labour market will not change decisively over
the next 30 years."
Forecasting the economic future, even for next twelve months, has proved difficult. VATT's
scientific conclusion is astonishing in view of continual enterprise restructuring, the
debate on the role and structure of the public sector, EU enlargement and the opening of
international borders. In my opinion the character of working life, work and the labour
market in Finland will change decisively already during the next 10 years.
5.3 Does industry attract young people?
The future labour shortage is partly a
matter of training young people in various trades, as opposed to the current need for
labour as such.
Secondary school leavers currently have an average of 1.5 places available to begin
studying at vocational and other educational institutions. About 60,000 babies are born
each year. The previous government's goal was that by 2004 there would be 49,000 vacancies
in vocational training, 25,000 in polytechnics and 19,000 in the universities. That makes
a total of 93,000 vacancies, exceeding clearly the need.
Given the option, the fashionable and comfortable trades attract young students, even
though the actual job prospects are poor. Studies in communications and the arts regularly
attract ten times more applicants than there are places available. The metal, construction
and transport industries, on the other hand, suffer from a shortage of students. The
government and public authorities are unwilling to intervene at this stage, however, and
have pinned their hopes on the power of persuasion.
Economic cycles have an impact on the popularity of various industries. News of mass
redundancies has shifted the emphasis away from the IT and telecommunications industries
towards traditional industry, banks and business services.
A spring 2002 study by the financial sector magazine Talouselämä showed that salaried
employees classed information technology, business services and telecommunications as the
most interesting industries. These employees assessed how pleased they would be to move
into these industries. In fourth place came the pulp and paper industry with a rating of
7.2 on a scale from 4 to 10. Energy production scored a slightly below average 6.5. The
chemical industry scored 6.2, coming close to the bottom end together with the public
sector and the textile and garment industry.
The most attractive employers in Finland were Nokia, Finnair and Tietoenator, followed by
UPM-Kymmene, Kone, Vaisala, Stora Enso, Fortum and Orion.
The picture changes somewhat when interviewing young people. It is a safe bet that the
"nerdy" sector has retained its popularity despite all difficulties. The appeal
and public image of smoke-stack industry, on the other hand, is not good. The pulp and
paper industry received poor marks in a European opinion survey published in spring 2002
by the European Commission. Most young people responded negatively to a question about
whether they would they be interested in working in the pulp and paper industry. In their
opinion the industry is repulsive, polluting and malodorous. The work was considered
monotonous and demanding of little skill.
Actual practise indicates otherwise - and in Finland young people are better informed of
the character and benefits of the pulp and paper industry. Last year one thousand young
people applied for just 30 vacancies at the UPM-Kymmene vocational school. 900 applied for
just 24 places at M-real's Silva vocational school. These figures indicate that there is
no lack of applicants and no cause for concern.
In Autumn 2002 fewer than 50,000 young people applied to study at vocational schools,
which was a 5 per cent fall from the previous year. Interest was expressed in the beauty
care, leisure-time activity, communication and visual arts fields, even though the labour
supply outstrips the employing capacity of these industries. 400 vacancies in engineering
studies were left unfilled. In industrial and transport studies only the paper and
chemical industries clearly had more applicants than available places.
5.4 Enlargement to the East no migrant labour
invasion in sight
Not all industries are equally attractive. Predictions vary, but
it is clear that to prevent labour shortages in the medium term Finland will need tens of
thousands, if not as many as 100,000 foreigners. The Confederation of Finnish Industry and
Employers TT has called on the government to adopt an active labour force policy
based on the needs of working life. Industry needs a competent and educated labour force.
Therefore, TT feels, it is not enough to depend on the random arrival of refugees.
Finland is currently the home of about 100,000 foreigners, comprising 2 per cent of the
population. This proportion is the smallest in the European Union; a fact that would not
essentially alter even if this figure were to double. Finland is the most monocultural
country in Europe. 13 per cent of the rank and file members of the paperworkers' union in
Sweden are immigrants, and the corresponding figure for the Industrifacket trade union is
as high as 19 per cent. This union organises such sectors as the chemical, rubber, glass
and textile workers.
On 1 May 2004 Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania become EU Member States. Their labour force
will not immediately begin to move freely, however, as most of the old EU Member States,
Finland included, have taken the opportunity offered by the Union to apply a transition
period of at least two years. If the labour market is driven to disorder, then this
transition period may be extended to five or even seven years.
Thousands of Estonians have been working in Finland since long before EU membership was on
the horizon for this country. There are also about 10,000 Russians living in Finland.
Interviews conducted by Gallup Finland indicate that half of the Estonians claim to be
interested in working abroad, 10 per cent of them in Finland. 5 per cent of Estonians
consider it probable that they might work in Finland occasionally, while 2 per cent would
be willing to settle in the country on a longer-term basis. In absolute terms this means
55,000 and 22,000 Estonians. The Ministry of Labour estimates that only 1,500 Estonians
per annum will move to Finland.
Receiving and integrating new citizens into Finnish society is an extremely important task
in which shop stewards and their trade unions have a firm role to play. Foreign employees
must be organised in the unions, otherwise the organising rate will fall and bargaining
power will be undermined. Foreigners must be welcomed into the working community and even
into Finnish homes. Finnish working conditions must be applied to work in Finland. Even
the employer associations agree on this point, though law-breaking entrepreneurs continue
to operate. These must be monitored by both the authorities and by the unions and their
activists.
In Sweden the industrial workers' trade unions intend to invest in activating immigrants
to serve in union policymaking bodies. Although 10 to 20 per cent of the rank and file
were born abroad, there has been no immigrant presence on the Board of the paperworkers'
union, nor among the union's officials. 8 per cent of the board members of the
Industrifacket trade union have a foreign background, as do 5 per cent of the union's
officials. However, promoting multiculturalism at workplaces and in union bodies is firmly
on the agenda.
At the same time we must not forget to work in the near-abroad. The organising rate in
Estonia has collapsed in the decade from the end of the Soviet Era: from a theoretical 100
per cent to about 15 per cent, and the pay level is one-sixth of the level in Finland. The
situation in Latvia, Lithuania and Poland is roughly the same. Labour-intensive operations
have increasingly been relocated to the Baltic countries, as well as to Poland where the
population is 40 million. The new EU Member States are fully entitled to receive foreign
investment and to lift their standard of living. Nevertheless, it would be better if this
development took place through genuine economic growth and increasing demand, instead of
through relocation of production operations to lower-cost countries.
The Finnish unions must provide resources for increasing the organising rate in the Baltic
countries and creating bargaining positions there. The Finnish chemical workers' union is
co-financing a survey that, over the next few years, will seek to reorganise the Estonian
chemical workers. The Finnish paperworkers' union has sent its officials, with encouraging
results, to assist in organising work at Estonian paper mills. The Finnish electricity
workers' union is collaborating with the Estonian energy workers' union.
It is worthwhile increasing investment in this work, even though progress sometimes seems
to be hopelessly slow. The burden of the Soviet system is still apparent. In the past it
was the job of the unions to cajole employees into implementing the five-year plans and to
distribute vacations at sanatoria. These sanatoria have gradually been privatised, and the
ministries no longer dictate wages and the salaries. The unions must find a reply to the
questions of young employees regarding why they should join the union and what kind of
benefits membership would provide.
Besides organising, the most important function is to invest in improving the credibility
of the Estonian unions as bargaining partners in relation to employers and the State. The
European Union is financing projects in all of the Baltic countries to promote social
dialogue and collective bargaining.
One approach is to use the subsidiaries of Finnish enterprises. Estonian shop stewards
rather uniformly testify that Finnish employers at least passively oppose organisation and
bargaining with the unions. The enterprises are happy with the poor level of collective
power of their employees, the lack of collective agreements and regulation of working
conditions only by contracts of employment. The Finnish and the Estonian unions should
work together to develop various solutions binding enterprises to comply with certain
ground rules and creating mechanisms for supervising enterprise behaviour.
Co-operation with the Finnish unions is essential, as local resources are limited. This
work is urgent, as 2004 is almost upon us.
5.5 Finland becomes a subsidiary company economy
The January 2001 decision of Stora Enso to close a
papermaking machine in Summa, Finland, another machine in Belgium, and a coating machine
in Sweden was indicative of a trend. The reason for the closure was the construction of a
new newsprint machine and an SC-paper machine at Landerbrugge in Belgium. For the
employees at the Summa paper mill this covertly prepared decision came as a complete
surprise, especially as the utility ratio of the old, repeatedly enhanced machine was 90
per cent. At that time there were 550 employees in Summa, and the closure was estimated to
affect 150 of them. As long ago as the merger of Stora and Enso in 1999 it was announced
that 400 to 500 employees from administration and marketing would be made redundant. It
was reckoned that the merger generated a benefit of EUR 760 million, as manufacturing of
various products was concentrated on fewer machines. Stora Enso has subsequently also
invested in Finland but concerns remain.
Head offices have been relocated away from Finland at a rapid
rate following corporate acquisitions and mergers. Telia took Sonera to Sweden, following
the earlier departure of Nordea. Scottish & Newcastle bought Hartwall, and General
Electric is seeking EU approval for its Instrumentarium acquisition. Stora Enso's
directors manage the enterprise from its London office, even though for the moment the
nominal Head Office is in Helsinki. The trend is towards gradually relocating head office
functions to other countries.
According to an inquiry published in autumn 2002 by the
Confederation of Finnish Industry and Employers - TT, Finland's status as a country of
corporate group establishment has deteriorated especially because of high income taxation.
Enterprises claim that it is difficult to get directors and experts from abroad. Moreover,
Finns who have moved abroad are unwilling to return to their homeland. Foreigners find the
Finnish language difficult, prices are high and Finland's location is problematic.
Finland is not alone in this kind of a situation. Almost
one-third of Sweden's 250 largest enterprises have relocated their head offices out of
Sweden. Swedish enterprises have also been sold abroad at an accelerating tempo. If
corporate acquisitions continue at the present tempo, then the extreme expert estimate is
that by 2015 Sweden's private industry will be entirely owned by foreign investors.
At the end of 2001 Finnish enterprises had 315,000 employees
abroad. In a single year this number increased by 27,000. Pulp and paper industry
enterprises have 73,500 overseas employees, while chemical industry enterprises have
22,800.
In spring 2002 the consultancy firm Ernst & Young asked
the directors of 200 large international enterprises what countries they would select as
the location of their head offices, factories, research centers and other places of
business. For people in the Nordic region the results were shocking, though not entirely
unexpected. Finland was not separately offered as an alternative, but the interest that
the country enjoyed is likely to be similar to the low ratings achieved by Sweden, Norway
and Denmark.
Favoured countries of large enterprise directors for
various operations (%)
| Operation |
FRA |
UK
IRL |
GER |
BENE
LUX |
ESP
ITA
GRE |
SWE
NOR
DEN |
POL
CZE
HUN |
Others |
| Head office |
19 |
22 |
10 |
40 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
| Factory |
6 |
15 |
7 |
7 |
16 |
2 |
40 |
6 |
| R&D |
35 |
14 |
23 |
7 |
4 |
8 |
- |
5 |
| Adm. and fin. |
19 |
38 |
5 |
16 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
| Call center |
16 |
39 |
6 |
17 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
| Design |
32 |
11 |
8 |
3 |
25 |
8 |
1 |
5 |
| Stor. and log. |
30 |
7 |
16 |
36 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
Source: Ernst & Young / Le Soir, Belgium 26 February
2002
The directors feel that an ideal enterprise would have its
head office in Brussels, factories in Prague, R&D centre at Sophia-Antipolis in the
South of France, administration and finance in London, call center in Dublin, planning and
design in Milan and storehouse and logistics in Rotterdam.
This survey was informal, and business decisions on location
are influenced by several factors. Nevertheless, reorganisations are following this trend
and the tempo is accelerating.
5.6 European works councils must be
supported and supervised
Amid the labyrinth of enterprise structures it is important
for unions and shop stewards to maintain direct and effective links to Group management
and the unions of the parent company wherever these operate. This is where unions should
focus their resources.
In 1994 the EU created a new tool for the trade union
movement: the European Works Councils (EWC). There are currently about 700 EWCs, with more
than 200 in the chemical, paper and energy sectors.
EWC practise is varied. In the most modest cases activities
are limited to a single annual meeting at which the enterprise management lectures on the
history of the enterprise and its prospects while the representatives sit passively as
audience. In the best cases EWCs form an international union network capable of exchanging
information between shop stewards in various units of the enterprise and acting together
when necessary.
The EWCs are, however, operating in an area that has
traditionally been the domain of the trade unions and of their local chapters and shop
stewards. The low organising rate in many countries and the participation of unorganised
employees in EWCs increase the danger that EWCs will begin to lead a life of their own. In
fact, even many powerful local activists who are organised in the unions are hoping for
this with no sense of danger.
As such, it was to be expected that once the common currency
was introduced all kinds of comparisons between benefits would increase, and that pressure
for harmonisation would gradually mount. It is also to be expected that discussion of
issues covered by traditional collective bargaining would increase at EWCs and in union
networks, regardless of the views of the unions. When the employer refers to labour costs
in various factories it is natural that employees should seek to make their own pay
comparisons. The same applies to working hour systems and other benefits.
This evolution will inevitably lead, on some issues and in
some enterprises, to some kind of general agreement applying to the entire corporate
Group. It is likely that international agreement and harmonisation of norms will begin
with easier matters, such as occupational safety, environmental control and training. The
unions must, however, carefully consider how EWCs and international union networks that
are based on EWCs will remain under the control of unions and organised labour.
In his study "European safeguarding of interests"
(2002) Jorma Löhman analyses the crucial question of whether a European Works Council can
negotiate a detailed collective agreement. The European engineering industry trade union
federation - EMF has endeavoured to draw a distinction between the role of the EWC and
traditional collective bargaining. Partly for practical reasons it has accepted
agreements, negotiated by councils controlled by organised labour on a limited range of
issues such as job security in situations of financial restructuring.
Löhman is of the view that in no country are EWCs controlled
by the unions. To a certain extent they are understood as a rival structure, particularly
now that they have begun to conclude agreements. EWCs may become independent participants
and may approve agreements on standards that fall below those of industry-wide collective
agreements. Negative competition between enterprises may even arise. The consciousness and
organising level of the employees may become significant factors.
Trade unions need a serious relationship with EWCs and must
integrate them into the system for defending interests. All unions must analyse the
significance of EWC activities for the union's work of defending interests, and must
rethink the division of responsibility and human resources. Trade union EWC co-ordinators
need to be trained, and they must be well-versed in EWC issues. They must take an interest
in these issues, and must have enough time to manage matters in this field.
5.7 Towards European trade union
coordination
A great deal of coffee has been consumed over the years at
meetings of the European trade union federations. The introduction of the common currency
and monetary policy is finally forcing the trade union movement to discuss seriously
co-ordinating cross-border collective bargaining.
The European Central Bank - ECB, which controls monetary
policy, has defined a maximum inflation rate of two per cent as price stability. If this
is exceeded, then interest rates are increased. During the unfavourable business cycle the
bank has been forced to ignore this definition, but it already takes care to monitor
collective bargaining keenly. The 6.5 per cent pay demand of the IG Metall trade union
last spring, coinciding with Germany's retarded economic growth, stimulated the ECB into a
cautious and polite intervention .
How will European bargaining proceed?
SAK President Lauri Ihalainen delivered a significant speech
last year on European collective agreements. Although national collective agreements
remain primary, Ihalainen believed that European level bargaining could proceed in four
areas:
- The basis of staff and pay policy will be unified in
multinational corporations.
- Industry-wide forms of co-operation will be sought, especially
in the transport and maritime sectors.
- Regional co-ordination will increase and diversify.
- Recommendation-like agreements between European labour market
partners will increase.
It will be a long time before collective agreements in the
chemical, paper and energy sectors are concluded in Brussels. Instead we may surmise that
affiliated trade unions will begin, within the European union federation - EMCEF, to
define common goals such as working hour reduction to the French 35-hour level. Under its
new General Secretary the EMCEF is turning its attention towards co-ordination. A data
bank of collective agreements is under construction.
Future co-ordination will focus on the prospects for common
pay claims or for claims bound to the "European pay equation". This means
estimating pay rises in terms of potential inflation plus productivity growth. This
concept is referred to in documents by the ETUC and the metalworkers federation - EMF.
Will "social dialogue" make the transition from
glorified coffee party to real activity? In the energy sector the unions and industry
organisations have engaged in good-natured co-operation at European level since the early
1990s. There are now also signs of progress in the chemical industry, where last year a
European organisation resembling an employers' federation was established.
But is the position of the trade union movement
simultaneously deteriorating? Tens, if not hundreds of thousands of jobs are disappearing
from European industry each year. The organising rate is slowly but surely falling in many
countries. In France and in Spain it now stands at only about 10 per cent. At what stage
will the employers really question the legitimacy of the trade union movement? We must
assume that all unions are interested in organising, including unions that are accustomed
to power originating mainly from a large public sector. Applying resources to increasing
the organising rate and maintaining it is one of the most important fundamental functions
of the trade union movement. It should be taken more seriously in the Nordic countries and
elsewhere.
5.8 From global framework agreements to
global enterprises
Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR) are fashionable expressions. The recent megascandals at enterprises in the USA and
in Europe have awakened even the most hardcore liberals to the fact that it is not enough
for enterprises merely to focus on finances, maximise profits and increase stock values to
new heights. An enterprise should also comply with the law or even behave well.
The trade union movement is interested in both control and
responsibility. In the Enron and Andersen cases enterprises broke the law or otherwise
behaved in an unethical manner. The outcome was that tens of thousands of employees lost
their jobs when the house of cards crushed into bankruptcy. Sales may also collapse when
an enterprise is caught polluting the environment or using child labour. When deciding
what to buy nowadays consumers are increasingly monitoring the behaviour of enterprises.
The basic values of the labour movement include defending the weaker party, whether in
Finland, France or Indonesia.
Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility are
separate, but to some extent parallel concepts. In the Anglo-Saxon world the former mainly
refers to guidance by enterprise owners. In continental Europe it also includes guidance
and monitoring by other interest groups.
The trade union movement shares this concept. Besides regular
negotiation and co-operation mechanisms, staff must be represented in the enterprise
administration at as high a level as possible. The representatives must be entitled to
receive all essential information, to participate in the consideration of important
strategic matters, and to express their views on the proposals of enterprise management
before decisions are made. Globalisation of enterprise structures often means that
representatives from various countries must be selected for adequate administrative
bodies. In the case of the Swedish-Finnish telecommunications operator TeliaSonera, a
conflict has unfortunately arisen between various staff groups. Even though there is no
obstacle preventing the enterprise management from selecting a representative of the
Finnish staff to serve on the board of the Swedish parent company, all three staff
representatives are Swedish.
The area of Corporate Social Responsibility is a confusing
one. There is a general opinion that an enterprise has some kind of economic, social and
environmental responsibility. The trade union movement is especially interested in social
responsibility, which incorporates the rights and welfare of employees.
The confusion arises because of the plethora of indicators
that have been created in a short period of time to measure social responsibility. These
indicators compete and partly overlap, and ironically, this area has itself grown into a
profitable business. The following are the most important initiatives and normative bases
for regulating and monitoring multinational enterprises:
- The guidelines of the International Labour Organisation (ILO)
- The OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises
- The Global Compact of the United Nations
- The SA 8000 Standard
- The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) reporting system
- Social audits made by auditing companies
- The in-house value declarations of the enterprise
- Framework agreements concluded by large enterprises and global
trade unions
The problem with most initiatives is that they are
characteristically recommendations entirely lacking an impartial monitoring mechanism. The
trade union movement therefore focuses on the last option on the list: the framework
agreements (or ethical agreements), whereby the enterprise commits itself to guarantee its
employees certain basic rights in all operations around the world.
Only some twenty global framework agreements have been
concluded so far. The largest signatories are the automotive industry giants
DaimlerChrysler and Volkswagen. Both of these have more than 350,000 employees. Most of
the global unions have determined framework agreements to be one of their major goals.
The experience of the first few years of framework agreements
have mainly been favourable. The agreements typically cover the basic conventions of the
ILO. This means rights of organisation and collective bargaining, and the prohibition of
child labour, forced labour and discrimination. The Statoil agreement (Norway) facilitated
the solution to a major conflict in the USA, benefiting both parties. Ethical behaviour by
IKEA (Sweden) subcontractors in Eastern Europe was secured through joint monitoring trips
by the parties.
Over the next few years dozens more agreements are expected.
The resources of the trade unions and international organisations alone will not suffice
to monitor these effectively. On the other hand, some initiatives, such as GRI reporting,
have proved rather useful. The toolbox approach is therefore gaining in popularity within
the global union organisations. In various situations the choice is between a combination
of various tools resulting in adequate monitoring of essential norms.
Finland's unions should bear their own share of
responsibility in pursuing the goals of their global organisations. Finland's global
industrial enterprises need their own agreements. The joint monitoring mechanism is
undoubtedly useful in improving fellow-feeling, in managing risks and in preventing
conflicts. A global framework agreement takes nothing from national and local bargaining,
but adds a new regulatory level above these and above the European Works Council, that is
relevant to the field of global operations.
5.9 Are we ready?
Changes in the operating environment require the trade unions
to apply new thinking and draw new conclusions. Quick answers to the following basic
questions should be sought:
- How must union structures and modes of action be changed in
order retain the ability to defend the interests of the rank and file under current and
future conditions?
- Does the union possess all of the skills (knowledge of
languages, expertise in issues, personal contacts with fellow unions) at central office
and enterprise level to deal with all of the matters that seem to be necessary in the
light of the foregoing analysis?
- How should the union recruit, train and reorganise the work so
that new strategic points of view could be converted into active operations?
The answers to these questions will to some extent vary
according to the enterprise structure of the industry and the trade union. The starting
point, however, seems to be clear. "International matters" are no longer
something that can be delegated to the Secretary for International Affairs, as was the
case in the closed economy of the 1970s. International borders are now wide open and this
affects Finnish industrial employees with increasing urgency as each day passes.
The behaviour of chemical, paper and energy sector
enterprises in Europe and in the wider world must therefore be understood as the starting
point for strategic planning and the organisation of operations by the unions. One of
their most urgent tasks is to internalise the international viewpoint and make this a
natural part of the role of every union President, official and shop steward in
international enterprises.
A Chinese proverb holds: "When the winds of change
blow, some construct walls, others windmills".
The challenges of the New Europe are challenges of the new
world. Walls can no longer be raised by any Don Quijote, even with the help of Sancho
Panza's army.
|