Trade Union News from Finland

| Start | Archive | Newsletter | Links | Publisher | About | Copyright


valikko


JUHANI ARTTO
HOMEPAGE 2009

HAKU / SEARCH

GALLERIA / GALLERY

TRADE UNION NEWS
FROM FINLAND 1997-2009

AY-UUTISET
MAAILMALTA 1999-2009

KOHTI KUMPPANUUTTA
- KUINKA SUOMI
OPPI TEKEMÄÄN
KEHITYSYHTEISTYÖTÄ
1965-2005

KAIKKI PELISSÄ -
SÄHKÖISET LISÄSIVUT

EVERYTHING AT STAKE - SAFEGUARDING INTERESTS IN A WORLD WITHOUT FRONTIERS

MEDIALINNAKKEET

BOLIVIA

HAITI

MUUT JUTUT
OTHER STORIES

INTERNET -
TIEDONHAUN OPAS 2.0

SUITSAIT

MUILLA SAITEILLA
ON OTHER SITES

LINKIT / LINKS

JULKAISIJA / PUBLISHER

© JUHANI ARTTO
1997-2009

juttupohja_1

UPM wants to transfer 300 forestry workers
to its prospective subcontractors


Helsinki (26.09.2006 - Juhani Artto) The forest industry giant UPM, based in Finland, plans to get rid of its remaining 300 forestry workers. The Wood and Allied Workers' Union warns that UPM’s real aim is to utilise low-pay labour from near-by countries, such as Estonia and Poland.

In its 11 September press release UPM stated as follows: "UPM is to explore the possibility of restructuring its forestry work to improve
cost-efficiency. During the autumn, the company will search for prospective partners and assess their ability to offer different types of forestry work services."

The company's idea is to offer the forestry workers, currently in its employ, to these forestry work service providers. The union regards the plan as unrealistic and damaging for the company. "It risks UPM's quality system and realization of the certificate's criteria", the union says, referring to the social clauses of the PEFC forest certificate system.

According to the union the plan threatens to become a dangerous precedent. "Never before employees have been contracted out to companies that do not even exist", the union says.

In the last few years the union has had bad experiences with several forestry work service companies. Unpaid wages has been one of the major problems. "In Finland, there are not sufficiently responsible forestry work service companies that could take responsibility of all work done until now by UPM's own forestry workers", UPM Forestry's shop-stewards argue. Therefore they believe that UPM is considering the possibility of acquiring such services from abroad.

As a considerable amount of work is anticipated in forests owned by UPM, the plan, to get rid of the company's own forestry workers must inevitably mean a policy to further dump wages and other terms of employment.

In the event a UPM forestry worker should opt to reject his removal to a vague subcontractor and give notice from his job, he would then loose considerable social benefits. Either alternative would mean the company thinks it can renege on the corporate social responsibility principles UPM has signed up to.

Read also: