Trade Union News from Finland

| Start | Archive | Newsletter | Links | Publisher | About | Copyright


valikko


JUHANI ARTTO
HOMEPAGE 2009

HAKU / SEARCH

GALLERIA / GALLERY

TRADE UNION NEWS
FROM FINLAND 1997-2009

AY-UUTISET
MAAILMALTA 1999-2009

KOHTI KUMPPANUUTTA
- KUINKA SUOMI
OPPI TEKEMÄÄN
KEHITYSYHTEISTYÖTÄ
1965-2005

KAIKKI PELISSÄ -
SÄHKÖISET LISÄSIVUT

EVERYTHING AT STAKE - SAFEGUARDING INTERESTS IN A WORLD WITHOUT FRONTIERS

MEDIALINNAKKEET

BOLIVIA

HAITI

MUUT JUTUT
OTHER STORIES

INTERNET -
TIEDONHAUN OPAS 2.0

SUITSAIT

MUILLA SAITEILLA
ON OTHER SITES

LINKIT / LINKS

JULKAISIJA / PUBLISHER

© JUHANI ARTTO
1997-2009

juttupohja_1


Merger, closer cooperation or…?
SAK’s Lyly maps options for future relations
between six industrial trade unions


Helsinki (29.12.2006
- Juhani Artto) Efforts to develop cooperation between six industrial trade unions have advanced to a new phase. In mid- December the unions chose SAK’s bargaining department head, Lauri Lyly, to examine the options for future relations between the six unions.

The main alternatives lie between a full merger and closer cooperation. Lyly has been asked to produce his analysis and findings by the end of March 2007. The unions did not in any way impose preconditions on Lyly’s challenge.

The six unions involved are

  • The Chemical Workers' Union
  • The Electrical Workers' Union
  • The Media Union
  • The Paper Workers' Union
  • The Wood and Allied Workers' Union
  • The Metalworkers’ Union

The unions, all affiliates of the largest union confederation SAK, made their mutual negotiations public in early 2006. After initial talks the Construction Trade Union withdrew from the negotiations.

A few months ago the Metalworkers’ Union joined the negotiations. The unions, now participating in the project, have 370,000 rank and file members and about 50 collective agreements in the many industries represented by them.

The Finnish way to merge unions is first to undertake a thorough analysis of the situation and then allow rank and file members plenty of time to discuss and consider the pros and cons of the various options at hand. In light of this, the unions now mention the year 2010 as the likely time when changes, if any, will take place. Before then the highest organs of the unions will have met and made their final decisions.

Pressure to tighten up the union structure within the SAK, stem largely from the changes which have occurred in working life. The borders or overlap between various industries have changed and are in a continuous process of change. The employer’s side has already come to its own conclusions and is radically reducing, through mergers, the number of national employer organisations. The employers also want to significantly reduce the number of national collective agreements, by seeking to combine several of the existing ones.

Read also: